Open to senior AI & data product roles

I build the data products
that make AI work —
and the AI itself.

Senior Product Manager, ex-Amazon, ex-o9 (T-Mobile). For nine years I owned the datasets behind enterprise ML forecasting and shipped AI analytics to hundreds of users. Then I went a layer deeper and started building autonomous AI agents myself.

The short version

At T-Mobile I led the data product layer for o9, an AI-powered supply-chain planning platform — designing the production datasets that feed its ML demand-forecasting, promo-lift, and inventory-optimization models, and rolling out Databricks Genie (AI natural-language analytics) to 300+ employees. I know what it takes to make AI reliable at enterprise scale.

Over a recent career transition I spent three months going hands-on: I designed, built, and deployed working AI products end to end — including an autonomous agent that orchestrates an LLM to do reviewable, structured work on a schedule. Below is the one I'm proudest of.

Featured project

I built an autonomous AI agent —
and pointed it at my own job search.

Flagship · Designed, built & deployed solo

Job Tracker — a scheduled, agentic document pipeline

Next.js 16 · Hono · Cloudflare Workers + D1 · Claude (headless, MCP) · Python

Inbox paste a URL Nightly agent headless Claude · 10pm Reason + tailor JD → experience map Render docs .docx · deterministic Review + reasoning log deterministic plumbing & model judgment, deliberately separated

Every night, unattended — ingest → reason → generate → render → human review. The agent explains itself on every run.

The idea

Most "AI document" tools are a chat box and a prompt. I wanted to answer a harder question: can an LLM run unattended, on a schedule, and produce work you'd actually trust? I picked a problem I had real stakes in — my own job search — and built a system that, every night, turns a structured profile plus a job posting into tailored application documents, to a quality bar I define, while showing its reasoning so I stay in control. The job-search use case kept me honest about quality; the agent architecture is what transfers to any high-stakes, repeatable knowledge work.

Decisions I'm proud of

  • LLM as orchestrator, not a chatbot. A runbook drives a multi-step, tool-using agent loop — ingest, dedup, reason, generate, render, publish, report.
  • A hard line between plumbing and judgment. State transitions, rendering, auth, and uploads are deterministic code (zero AI); only the genuine judgment calls go to the model. Knowing which is which is half the design.
  • Human-in-the-loop, by construction. The agent writes a reasoning log every run — what it emphasized, stretched, and skipped — so review is an approval step, not blind trust.
  • Guardrails as a contract. Non-negotiable content rules plus a structured output schema keep every autonomous run on-spec — the start of a real eval loop.

Also built

🩺

Life Tracker

Next.js · Cloudflare · D1

A self-built, deployed full-stack health-tracking app on the same stack — proof I can ship and run a real app with a database, end to end.

● Deployed
🎲

Board-game balance simulator

Simulation · modeling

A board game I designed and am playtesting, with a simulation engine I built to model balance — playthrough simulation and win-rate analysis.

○ Write-up coming soon

Experience

Where I've worked

T-Mobile
Sr. Manager / Sr. PM — data products for o9 (AI planning) & the Databricks Genie rollout
2019 – 2026
Amazon
Sr. Program Manager — Amazon Business (B2B) analytics
2017 – 2019
Earlier · Education
Data & analytics roles · MBA, The Ohio State University — Supply Chain & Analytics
2011 – 2017

Full résumé available on request — vardhaman.patil88@gmail.com